5. How much clean electricity do we really need (subtitles)
00:16
Hello, how is everyone feeling?
00:18
(Cheers)
00:20
Are you ready to solve climate change?
00:22
(Cheers)
00:23
Good.
00:24
Do you know what a pettawat hour is?
00:27
Yeah, it's a unit of energy like kilowatt hour or megawatt hour.
00:32
I've been a climate activist since age 11
00:35
and I studied engineering,
00:36
and so I was familiar with those terms.
00:38
Kilowatt, megawatt, even gigawatt and terawatt.
00:43
But I had never heard of a petawatt hour
00:45
until I wrote a book on climate change solutions.
00:47
That's because it's so big.
00:50
But that's the scale I want to talk about.
00:52
A petawatt hour is a trillion kilowatt hours.
00:57
And today the world generates about 25 trillion kilowatt hours
01:01
of electricity each year.
01:03
Most of that is from fossil-fuel power plants,
01:06
and the dominant mindset is that we have to change
01:08
the current electricity system
01:10
by replacing those fossil-fuel plants
01:12
with clean generation by 2050.
01:16
Well, over one third of our electricity generation is already clean,
01:20
mostly from hydro and nuclear,
01:21
along with wind and solar,
01:23
and clean generation is growing.
01:25
Projections based on current policies around the world show
01:28
that we are on track to have about 25 petawatt hours
01:32
of clean electricity generation in 2050.
01:35
That's two and a half times today's amount of clean generation
01:39
and equal to today's total generation.
01:42
So this is great.
01:43
We can replace all our fossil fuel plants,
01:45
have a clean version of today's world,
01:48
walk away, we've solved climate change.
01:50
Thank you very much.
01:52
Oh, but I did forget one tiny little detail.
01:56
We actually need five times that much.
02:00
To be clear, we need and we're on track to have
02:02
two and a half times today's amount of clean generation
02:06
to switch to a clean version of our current electricity system.
02:10
But changing the current system isn't enough.
02:13
We need five times that,
02:16
all of it clean,
02:17
or 12 times today's clean electricity production,
02:21
to actually avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
02:25
Can I repeat that?
02:26
To avoid the worst impacts of climate change,
02:29
we have to multiply today's clean electricity production by 12 times.
02:35
There are four main reasons we need that much.
02:38
First, let’s keep in mind scientists’ goalpost for addressing climate change:
02:42
achieving net-negative emissions globally by around 2050.
02:47
Most of us know that to do so,
02:48
we'll have to electrify a whole range of vehicles,
02:51
heating systems and some industrial processes.
02:54
Electric equipment is more efficient than fuel-based equipment.
02:57
So electrification actually lowers total global energy demand,
03:01
but it increases electricity generation needed.
03:04
In our current energy world,
03:06
electrifying 60 percent, which is ambitious,
03:08
would add enough demand
03:10
that we would need roughly 40 petawatt hours
03:13
of total electricity generation by 2050.
03:17
Second, it's not OK to simply replace today's world with a clean version.
03:23
In today's world,
03:25
over 700 million people don't have access to electricity.
03:29
Billions more have access only to small amounts
03:32
or to unreliable supply that often cuts out.
03:35
Energy demand in rich industrialized countries will grow more slowly
03:39
over the next few decades with increased efficiency.
03:42
But energy demand in developing countries will continue to grow dramatically,
03:47
especially if we can make electricity cheaper.
03:49
This is good.
03:50
Energy access is lifting people out of poverty,
03:53
driving access to education,
03:56
commerce, health care and lower birth rates.
03:59
Both for moral and practical reasons,
04:01
those of us in richer countries need to realize that addressing climate change
04:05
will necessarily center
04:07
on a massive expansion of energy access in developing countries.
04:12
So electricity generation will have to grow even more
04:15
and get cheaper
04:16
to accommodate global economic development.
04:18
Based on projections of global development by 2050,
04:22
generation needed rises to 60 petawatt hours per year.
04:27
The third reason is a bit more debatable,
04:29
but it needs to be talked about more in public discourse.
04:32
It has to do with the fact
04:33
that not everything can be electrified by 2050.
04:36
Long-range airplanes, for instance,
04:38
are still going to need the energy density of a liquid fuel.
04:40
Similar for some industrial processes.
04:43
Now, many models waive this issue away with two overoptimistic assumptions:
04:48
that all those factories continue burning fossil fuels but use carbon capture,
04:53
which costs extra and will only happen where governments mandate it,
04:56
and that all those long-range vehicles use sustainable biofuel,
05:00
which is only sustainable if every supplying country,
05:03
and its local governments,
05:05
fully enforces strict standards for biomass
05:08
to avoid deforestation and other impacts
05:10
that could increase emissions from agriculture.
05:13
Some amount of carbon capture at factories and sustainable bioenergy
05:17
will absolutely be part of the picture.
05:19
But I’ve been in politics,
05:21
and I am sure that we should plan for imperfect policy.
05:25
And that means we need to plan
05:27
for building even more electricity generation.
05:29
We can use this additional generation to synthesize fuels
05:33
that are truly carbon neutral or entirely carbon free:
05:36
hydrogen, ammonia, synthetic jet fuel and others.
05:40
This is a much rougher estimate,
05:42
but to be confident of minimizing climate change impacts,
05:46
we should aim to push our line up to around 90 petawatt hours per year.
05:52
Finally, the fourth reason is that we need not only net-zero
05:55
but net-negative emissions in 2050.
05:58
There will be some non-energy emissions that remain, especially from agriculture.
06:02
And we'll have to pull CO2 from the atmosphere
06:04
to make up for those.
06:06
But we also need to use all our possible carbon-removal methods
06:10
at their maximum capacity
06:12
to remove more CO2 each year,
06:14
getting as far as possible in o net-negative emissions,
06:16
drawing down levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere
06:19
to eventually restore a stable climate.
06:22
One of the carbon-removal methods we’ll have to use is direct air-capture:
06:26
arrays of fans filtering CO2 from the air.
06:28
And doing enough of this to restore safe temperatures within decades,
06:32
not centuries,
06:33
will require yet more electricity generation.
06:36
Again, the exact amount depends on quite how ambitious we're able to be.
06:40
But for a comfortable rate of carbon removal,
06:42
we would need perhaps 120 petawatt hours per year total.
06:48
So roughly five times today's total global electricity system,
06:53
12 times today's clean electricity production,
06:56
and that can actually achieve net-negative emissions globally.
07:00
And there's a bonus reason to consider.
07:02
Because clean electricity is going to power so much
07:05
of the rest of the transition: electrification, global development,
07:08
synthesized fuels and sequestration,
07:11
to achieve net-negative emissions by 2050,
07:14
we should really build as much as possible
07:16
of that new electricity generation
07:18
at the beginning of the transition, starting now.
07:21
This will make sure that clean electricity is abundant
07:24
and cheap soon enough
07:25
to still leave time for all of the other transitions that rely on it
07:28
to fully roll out by 2050.
07:30
And when we talk about abundant and cheap electricity,
07:33
we're talking about eliminating poverty faster,
07:35
powering access to water desalination,
07:37
strengthening medical supply chains,
07:39
so much more.
07:41
Decarbonizing and scaling electricity generation
07:44
will also be the biggest global development project ever.
07:49
So if we want to avoid the worst of climate change,
07:51
we need to discard that dominant mindset
07:54
about merely replacing fossil fuel generation.
07:57
My point is, that misses the scale.
08:00
Our project is not changing the current global electricity system.
08:05
Our project is building a new global electricity system.
08:09
Political action that tinkers around within the current system
08:12
will never get us where we need to be by 2050.
08:15
Arguments over which sources of clean electricity we should use are unhelpful.
08:19
We need all of them:
08:21
hydro, solar, wind, nuclear, advanced nuclear,
08:25
advanced geothermal,
08:26
mandates for carbon capture on remaining fossil plants.
08:29
If you look at the potential rates of addition for each of these,
08:32
you'll see we need everything as much as possible
08:34
and we may still fall short.
08:38
It's not changing the electricity system.
08:40
It's building a new electricity system.
08:43
One five times bigger than today's total system
08:46
and 100 percent clean.
08:49
As fellow youth activists often say,
08:50
the project is much more comparable
08:52
to the World War II-era manufacturing boom
08:54
than anything the world has done since.
08:56
Building new things that we've barely ever built before,
09:00
in massive amounts, to create a new system entirely.
09:04
In fact, this mindset goes beyond electricity-generation itself.
09:07
Many people are wary of ambitious climate action
09:10
because they see the project as changing the familiar current world.
09:14
That's not it.
09:15
Addressing climate change means building a new world.
09:19
A world in which energy is healthier,
09:22
doesn't pollute the air we breathe
09:24
and where it's cheaper and everyone globally has access to it.
09:28
A world with higher incomes,
09:30
longer and better lives,
09:32
greater equality.
09:35
A better world.
09:37
Thank you, and let's make it happen.
09:39
(Applause)